Okay, so popular music isn’t exactly the last bastion of feminism, but I can’t help but be a little saddened by some of the lyrics on the radio these days.
Take Avril Lavigne for example. Her new song “Girlfriend” is a sonic catfight, where she calls her crush’s girlfriend stupid and, like, so whatever. The video involves Avril attacking said girlfriend with a golf ball and laughing as she falls into a pond. Isn’t there already enough violence in high schools without Avril helping out?
Carrie Underwood’s song “Before He Cheats” manages to embrace not only girl-hating but classism, as she refers to her bf’s other gf as a white trash tramp who can’t shoot whiskey (ooo! burn!).
I guess the reason why these two songs make me take to the liquor cabinet more than, say the Pussycat Dolls, is that both Avril and Carrie have been held up as good role models for young women. Avril has been applauded for eschewing raunchiness and being proudly individual where other pop tarts don’t (Sidebar: I strongly disagree with that, and think that Avril is an individual in the most sheep-like way, but hey, that’s what the critics are saying) and Carrie, as a Christian rock goddess and supporter of the troops is seen to be a good alternative to, well, fallen blonde American Christians such as Britney Spears and Jessica Simpson.
What disturbs me the most is that I’m pretty sure both these singers have seen that a good way to up their popularity is by attacking “stupid girls” or “tramps.” Avril has on numerous occasions spoken out against female pop singers who attract attention with revealing clothes, saying that she wants to be appreciated for her music first. Seeking the rewards of girl-hating are probably not conscious acts on Lavigne or Underwood’s part, but they still do it pretty effectively.
The irony is that Avril attacks the sell-out-iness of women who wear bikinis just to sell records, at the same time as she’s attacking other women, because, well, it sells records. Essentially both Lavigne and Underwood are rewarded for hating other women, for being cooler and more moral than stupid tramps - and as walking industries, they’re taking advantage of that. Come on now, that’s not right.
(I suppose I should mention I just wrote a novel on this topic. Okay, now that is the last time I will hijack our blog for disgusting promotional purposes.)
All this just intensifies my now uncontrollable love for Beyonce, who has gone from demanding that a man pay her automobills (please see Bills Bills Bills, circa 1998) to only hiring female musicians (see video for Irreplaceable, circa 2006).
Ciara has an interesting take on the whole topic with her new single “Like a Boy.” Though the song essentialises male and female behaviour by suggesting that women naturally get cheated on, and men naturally cheat (wow, did I just use the word “essentialise” to talk about a pop song?) it does question cultural power dynamics that can destroy relationships. I especially like the video, where at the end a bunch of girls dress up as men and do a dance number not to be sexy (none of them really look stereotypically sexy, and there’s not a single boob or butt close-up) but to turn gender stereotypes on their heads. Drag king-ing in a mainstream music video? I think that’s pretty great.



Digg
six comments
Can I just say this line: "fallen blonde American Christians such as Britney Spears and Jessica Simpson" made me laugh so hard I spit up my soup.
Genius Thea, genius. As per usual.
Posted by Stacey May
April 27, 2007, 4:44 PM
Thank you for writing this! I thought I was the only one who was irritated by Avril's recent antifeminist image. I have yet to see the video, but I was shocked when I listened to this song. It was a far cry from the more positive lyrics of "He Wasn't" (circa 2004).
I was a bit of a closet Avril fan you could say. Ive never bought any of her albums but I respected her because as you mentioned, she carved out her own place in pop mainstream and she's Canadian (and we stick together).
This song just reeks of record label big wigs pulling the strings. Insidiously telling her she needs to market to a new audience of Tweens because thats where her real fan base (and the money) lays.
Her recent disturbing make-under to appear 14 years old is proof of the record industrys hand firmly up her butt, puppet style. She's in her 20's, traveled the world, and married. Why then is she still prancing around in clothes you could buy at La Senza girl calling herself the mother (f*cking) princess? I guess I just expected some more adult issues and growth in her lyrics this time around.
I could be wrong, but this seems to reek of feminist backlash. Weve seen it before; pit all women against each other because while they are in combat there is no chance of community. When there is no community, there is no chance of rebellion.
Posted by Nikki
April 29, 2007, 10:38 AM
If Avril's stance was Anti-american girl behavior via slamming those pop tarts mentioned, you would only agree with her. As her stance is neutral of geo-politics as far as I am able to surmise, she's seen as bimbo bashing for the sake of solidarity?? Why is any woman's choice to be percieved as a human barbie doll a positive concept? Of course Avril sells, as they all do, regardless of their song content...although song content with today's music LOL! Anyways, it's all about window dressing and WHO looks like WHAT and at least the gal keeps her clothes on and doesn't suggest someone hit her baby one more time or whatever. Cyndi Lauper has been solely performing with female musicians for years, as does Yoko Ono, etc. Agreed, it's all just more of the same old business though, women beating on other women, but then we're pretty nasty to each other without any help from guys and the male dominated media...to me there will never be such a thing as female solidarity...it's not apart of our psychology as we stupidly pit ourselves against each other for social acceptance, social definitions fueled by the media and our image of self-worth, and finally over men (vomiting). Gotta admit it ladies, we're all tools and will always be, what's a little Canadian gal gonna do to tip the scales?
Posted by lealea
April 29, 2007, 3:11 PM
"were pretty nasty to each other without any help from guys and the male dominated media to me there will never be such a thing as female solidarity its not apart of our psychology as we stupidly pit ourselves against each other for social acceptance, social definitions fueled by the media and our image of self-worth"
I have to say I really disagree with that. I'm pretty sure that if it wasn't for the media and other distributors of our culture (I wouldn't blame this on men though, I think men also suffer at the hands of arbitrary gender roles) we wouldn't be so nasty to each other. Like Avril and Carrie are nasty because they've learned that hating on other girls ups their points. It's actually a pretty common type of behaviour in prisoners or "oppressed groups" - the best way to differentiate yourself from your powerless comrades is to hate on them, just like those who are more powerful than you hate on you.
I think female solidarity totally exists! Shameless is proof of that!
Posted by Thea
April 29, 2007, 4:05 PM
I suppose Pink's "Stupid Girls" could be added to the list, but I don't know if the issue is just about hating on other girls.
Revenge seems to have its place in music, whether it's toward women or men (Alanis "You Oughta Know" or K.Clarkson's vid for "Since You Been Gone"--and they've garnered respect for penning these songs; which makes me wonder whether revenge against men is somewhat more acceptable?). And maybe there are perfectly good reasons why Avril or Underwood don't like the people they're dissing in their music? Underwood doesn't seem to like the guy in her song either.
I guess I don't think a solidarity even exists simply among lines of gender, race, sexual-orientation, etc. etc. Moreso, I think the solidarity comes from people who share the same values.
Posted by Brian
May 1, 2007, 10:32 PM
I think P!nk's "Stupid Girls" is a comment on the trend of women getting ahead by acting stupid, or engaging in other self detramental behaviours. It's a case of playing up to patriarchal culture for some crums. She sings "What ever happened to the first woman president? She's dancing in a video next to Fifty Cent." P!nk is opening a discussion about the ways that women are pressured to sacrifice their intelligence, and dignity just so they can be popular. It's gross but to many women it seems like the most viable choice.
Avril, on the other hand, in her "Girlfried" video hates on a girl who dresses kinda geeky (is that geek chic?) and wears glasses... contradictory if you think back to the liner note's of her first album. Grrrr.
Blah, let's listen to Kinnie Starr! ....or make our oun music for a change.
Posted by cait
May 10, 2007, 9:34 AM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.