
Earlier this summer, I was gripped by an outpouring of love so unexpected and powerful that it was bewildering - when I heard that the Spice Girls were reuniting. I called up my best friend from high school close to tears, it was the first thing I told anyone I knew when I ran into them, I sang 2 Become 1 until my friends threatened to lock me in my room.
But it’s not like I was the world’s biggest Spice Girls fan when they were actually cool. I never bought any of their albums, I rolled my eyes in disbelief at girls who wore “Girl Power” t-shirts, and I pretended not to know any of the words to “Spice Up Your Life” (I knew all of them). In fact, I didn’t know anyone when I was 16 who would’ve admitted that they liked the Spice Girls.
Could it be that you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone? The Spice Girls with their flamboyant, cheerful destruction of any oppressive authority, their emphasis on fun, their declarations of their own powerfulness, their sunny irreverence, their emphasis on community, and their odes to friendship seem like definite proponents of feminism.
I think my nostalgia for the Spice Girls, and my excitement at their reunion has to do with the fact that today, it seems like anything remotely feminist could never be a pop cultural movement. Our top female pop icons today are the Pussycat Dolls, who seem to confuse empowerment with objectification, Brats dolls which encourage 2 year-olds to make themselves sexually appealing to hetero men, and Avril and Carrie.
Even the fact that the Spice Girls each had distinct personalities (something that at the time seemed like a gross marketing ploy) at least distantly connected to their actual personalities differentiates them from contemporary girl pop stars. Be honest, if Katharine McPhee and Suzie McNeil were standing side by side, wouldn’t you have a leetle trouble telling them apart? Girl stars these days are generally portrayed as identical, glossy-haired, boy-crazy girls-next-door - even if their offstage antics make it easy to tell who’s who (see Lindsay Lohan and Hilary Duff for example).
But in their heyday the Spice Girls were accused of co-opting feminism just to sell records, mostly because they acted foolish and emphasised being pretty. I can’t help but feel though, that the Spice Girls made the message that girls can be powerful and valuable in their own rights available to girls and women who might not otherwise hear it. Feminism is often seen as reserved for university-educated, middle class white women (hence Miss G___’s attempt to liberate it from the Ivory Tower_). And in many ways it’s not easy for women who feel uncomfortable in predominantly white, middle class spaces to embrace feminism. I know that I didn’t want to have anything to do with feminism until I was way into my 20s.
The Spice Girls, on the other hand, were accessible to anybody within range of a TV or radio, almost anywhere in the world. In a recent Addicted to Race podcast on Feminism and Women of Colour (recommended for both white feminists and women of colour feminists alike), Latoya Peterson revealed that the Spice Girls were what got her first hooked on feminism. I even have a friend whose coming out story features the Spice Girls in a starring role.
I don’t know, is my over the top enthusiasm for the Spice Girls, on the basis of their feminist power, sign that I’ve gone senile? Does anyone else here love the Spice Girls like I do?
In any case, I know that what I really really want is a ticket to their Toronto show…



Digg
11 comments
I recall going to see Spice World when it first came out (I guess it was 1997 or so) and being terrified that someone from my feminist activist group would see me there and I'd get excommunicated, like Spinoza.
I do often reference the Spice Girls' catch-phrase "girl power!" as my example of feminist movements going to hell when they hit the mainstream, but maybe you've made me reconsider my ways... maybe. I'll have to think about it some more.
Posted by Anna
August 13, 2007, 6:30 PM
As a 9 year old girl, the Spice Girls were the best thing ever. My friends and I loved them not only because we could sing their catchy songs at recess, but also because each of us could relate to one of the Spice Girls. I was a "Baby Spice" whereas my best friend was a "Sporty Spice". Each of us had a place and each of us felt included. I remember walking around at recess with my girlfriends shouting "Girl Power!" and I can really say, that is where my feminist streak began. And still going strong.
And if the Spice Girls come to my city, I will be digging out my Spice Girls T-shirt and binder and go see them.
Posted by Evey
August 13, 2007, 7:47 PM
Anna: I too saw the Spice Girls movie- the very day it was released, and felt the fear I would be caught. In retrospect (and things are always better in retrospect) the Spice Girls were actually much better than some of the choices we have today. I mean, the Pussy Cat Dolls are a very different kind of girl power, aren't they? And don't get me started on the Duff again.
Has anyone seen Victoria Beckham: Coming to America? I downloaded the show and watched it on a sick day and was actually very entertained by Posh's antics and pleasantly surprised by the fact that she really didn't take herself all that seriously. Against my best intentions, I found myself loving her within half an hour. Yes, at times she seems like a walking cardboard cut out, but I did pee my pants laughing when she went to a Beverley Hills socialite tea party and got everyone drunk on shooters. She's a self-professed "girly-girl" of the highest order, but hey - she's shameless, and I think the fact that we're here means we're all in agreement that that matters.
No Thea, your not wrong to have a fondness for the Spice. I have a lot of (daily) guilty pleasures that are similiar that I'm not willing to give up.
By the way, Sporty is my favourite.
Posted by Stacey May
August 14, 2007, 7:06 AM
I have a distant memory of actually boycotting the Spice Girls movie. What joys I deprived myself of...
I was talking with a friend about this topic, and she said, but isn't the Spice Girls emphasis on extreme consumerism, targeted towards little girls, inexcusable? Well, yeah. Okay, so they're pretty imperfect as feminist heroes. But as bell hooks says, things can be good and bad at the same time...right?
Posted by Thea
August 14, 2007, 1:06 PM
Definitely. My patent leather stiletto Manolo Blahniks are a perfect example ...
...although I don't think that's what bell hooks meant when she said that...
Posted by Stacey May
August 14, 2007, 5:30 PM
What's wrong with being a "girly girl" - just curious
Posted by Michelle
August 16, 2007, 5:01 AM
Thanks for the shout-out to Addicted to Race! :) And that retouching post is priceless. I've already sent that web site on to everyone I know.
Posted by Carmen Van Kerckhove
August 16, 2007, 7:54 AM
Hi Michelle - whoops, did someone say being a girly girl was wrong? I personally am a fan of the girly girl, boyey girly and anyone else, you know, as long as their fashion choices aren't causing harm.
Posted by Thea
August 16, 2007, 1:50 PM
Is it just me, or are the Spice Girls looking really hot in that photo? Hotter than ever before? Ok, I guess this is the least intelligent post in the bunch but just realizing my attraction to girly-girls, femmes, to all interpretations of the feminine persuasion... and it seems to me that often enough in lesbian communities, femme girls don't get the attention and respect they deserve because they supposedly "look/act straight". Instead, I like to think that women like the Spice Girls are following in the sexy footfalls of many a queer femme - not the other way around!
Posted by pike
August 21, 2007, 10:44 AM
"...femme girls don’t get the attention and respect they deserve because they supposedly look/act straight."
Actually piKe, MOST intelligent post in the bunch. Thank you.
Posted by Stacey May
August 21, 2007, 10:55 AM
One of the first things I read about the spice girls reunion rather depressed me. They have renounced their ties to femmenism spouting some of the worst cliches about it (angry women, backstabbers, humorless/no-fun). Something has changed. Maybe it was never there in the first place, but now their immage has shifted. Case and point - Scary no longer has her natural hair. If they were so femmenist, it's also worth asking why motherhood and a girl-fight about the relitive hotness of two of them sidetracked their career the first time. Also, it was them, more than any other group, who created a generation of tweens to be marketed to and to be ,often creepily, sexualised. It was them whose fame was used to power the mock beauty pagent of American Idle. As people and activist, I don't trust them. Already in their heyday they were doing chair/dances reminicient of strip shows and brandishsed whips in tight leather in a pain-sex type dance on a music vedio. It was their appeal the Bratz dolls took off from (after all they were made into Barbieish toys themselves, their impact on toys alone has been sweeping) How can any femmenist nickname herself "baby"?
And yet I spent their whole fame impersonating them with a female friend I still have and a slightly younger boy who since drifted out of my life. I'm both in love with them and utterly horrified by them . I guess it's their immage I like. I will alway thing wannabe is femmenist. I will download their early stuff. I love their appeal to commuity, queerness, diversity, femmenism . . . Someone should write a good book about them! I want to! Does anybody know if it's been done already? I'll read it if I don't have to write it! I can talk endlessly about them. Please respond with books! Summer is coming! I long to read about girl power.
Posted by Myra
April 7, 2008, 9:10 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.