As a moviegoer whose cinematic diet as of late has been rather heavy on action-packed popcorn flicks (Hello, Live Free or Die Hard! How ya doin’, Bourne Supremacy? I hate you with the fiery passion of a thousand burning suns, Spiderman 3 hours of my life I’ll never get back!), I’m looking forward to an unusually high number of indie/arthouse flicks over the next few months. One of them, which premiered at the Toronto Film Festival, is Juno, an apparently heartwarming comedy about a teenage girl who suddenly finds herself pregnant, and has to decide what to do with the baby. In addition to being an obvious choice for Arrested Development fans, thanks to the presence of Jason Bateman and Michael Cera, Juno looks to be genuinely funny and a great vehicle for young actress Ellen Page, who’s already in the unofficial running for an Oscar nomination thanks to the movie.
Ellen Page as a very pregnant Juno and Olivia Thirlby as Leah in Juno. (Fox Searchlight)
Since this plot point is revealed in the first few seconds of the movie’s trailer, I’ll give it up here: Juno decides to give her baby up for adoption to a childless couple, played by Bateman and Jennifer Garner. The movie hasn’t even been released outside festivals and test screenings yet, so I won’t tell you exactly how abortion is treated in the film, but suffice it to say the option is considered—and then dropped.
This hasn’t escaped the notice of some reviewers. Salon’s Stephanie Zacharek touched briefly on the subject:
The only downside is that although the picture shows no evidence of having a right-to-life agenda, it’s going to spawn a million Sunday arts section stories about the new “trend” — which began, of course, with “Knocked Up” — in movies about women who choose to not have abortions. If either “Juno” or “Knocked Up” spewed any nonsense about abortion being murder, I’d be worried. But in both movies the women simply decide, impulsively, that they’d just rather not terminate their pregnancies. Sometimes a choice is just a choice. But you know how hard it is to come up with those Sunday arts section ideas.
Well, okay, Ms. Zacharek. I’ll bite.
Juno‘s consideration of abortion as an option is, at least, more fleshed out than Knocked Up. The popular summer comedy, staring Seth Rogen and Katherine Heigl as the parents of an unexpected child, can’t even bring itself to say the word “abortion”—“the A word” and “smushmortion” is as close as we get, and the choice phrases are uttered by Rogen’s set of slacker friends. Heigl’s character, when asked by her mother about “taking care” of the situation, immediately rejects the idea. And that’s pretty much the end of the abortion discussion.
If you’ve read any of the abortion discussion about Knocked Up (and there’s no shortage of opinions) you’ve probably already read the initial response of “hey, this movie doesn’t give enough attention to abortions,” so I won’t go there. You’ve maybe also read the argument that “there wouldn’t be a movie if she got an abortion.” This argument applies to Juno as well—if Juno has an abortion, we’d have a very different movie.
With both movies there’s a concern that abortion is marginalized not because the producers have anti-abortion agendas, but because America somehow isn’t ready or willing to watch people seriously hashing out the possibility of abortion on camera, or that abortion just doesn’t fly in a mainstream comedy. Judd Apatow, the creator of Knocked Up, claimed the omission of abortion from the movie wasn’t a political choice:
In numerous interviews, Apatow, the writer and director, said that many of the film’s humor scenes were improvised and there was a great deal of “abortion” talk in scenes that wound up on the cutting room floor. “It’s very, very funny, but really shocking and disturbing,” he said in one interview. “It may have killed Jerry Falwell.”
But wait, hang on—there is one recent example of a comedy that manages to handle the issue of abortion relatively well without minimizing its complexities or preaching too much. And it comes not from a two-hour movie but a half-hour sitcom: Scrubs. Last season, the show devoted an entire episode to the question of whether the main character, JD, and his girlfriend, Kim, should keep their unexpected child. I don’t think it’s much of a spoiler to say that in the end, there’s no abortion. But the way the show depicts JD and Kim grappling with the issue is funny without being insulting, and the show even manages to include a monologue from *gasp* a character who has actually had an abortion.
I’m not saying you’d necessarily agree with the way Scrubs handles the abortion issue, especially if you lie on either extreme of the abortion debate. But if a sitcom can cram that much complexity into 22 minutes, surely a whole movie can afford to give the abortion issue more than “shmushmortion.”




Digg
nine comments
I hardly think those two unrelated films create a trend. Knocked Up was more about the relationship between Heigl and Rogan's characters, which would have never occurred quite the same way had there been an abortion, in fact, we'd have no movie at all.
Juno's internal conflicts about pregnancy are much deeper and were more interesting. She didn't seem to have a real strong opinion either way, until she saw the BORED, NORMALIZED expressions of the other women in the clinic, that and as we learn, her family history being the way it is, it gives more incentive to want to follow through and do something for somebody else. I think the film also wanted to take the 'freak' girl and make her the one who doesn't get the abortion, in the way that other movies dealing with teen pregnancy always talk up adoption as a way to avoid abortion and be a 'good person' and give the baby up for adoption, but Juno (film) shows that we don't neccessarily adopt this attitude as a society, despite delivering it as an option to pregnant teens. The ultrasound technician was a great example of this..
I think if you're looking for a 'trend' in edgy teen pregnancy comedies, it shouldn't be too hard to compare Juno to Saved! and How to Deal, which both have Mandy Moore as a (non-pregnant) lead, and both movies have the girl keeping the baby.
But back to 'shmushmortion' Juno is a film that rarely allows the audience member to go more than 30 seconds without a reference, ironic quip or a laugh, something that is determined quite early, so it would be out of character, as a film, for it to delve into the abortion issue, other than explaining that Juno is just the kind of girl to know, instinctively, what she will and will not do. To be honest, I was more surprised that she allowed Vanessa to touch her stomach and not make some smart-ass comment as she did so, THAT was the most touching scene as far as I'm concerned.
Posted by Danielle
November 17, 2007, 1:17 AM
I think it's really odd that America "isn't ready" to deal with abortion on screen, considering the fact that in 80's movies if a girl got pregnant, she almost always got an abortion (Hello Fast Times at Ridgemont High!). It's almost like having the baby is the new having an abortion. Are ladies on screen keeping their babies to buck an earlier trend of abortion in films, or are they having their babies because America's going backwards in terms of what is acceptable on film?
I think the response that "if they had abortions, it would be a different film therefore they have to keep the baby" is a bit silly - obviously it would be a different film, it would be a film about an abortion. I think the issue people are taking both with Knocked Up and Juno (which I should say I haven't seen) is that abortion isn't considered as a serious option, not that the ladies should immediately have an abortion.
Which brings us to Saved! (which I love, by the by), which I think does a really good job of considering abortion, or rather, explaining why the lead doesn't have an abortion - she's a Christian school girl, and it's just not an option for her. As far as I can gather, neither Juno nor Knocked Up offer such persuasive reasons for why their leads so quickly make the choice to keep the baby.
There's nothing wrong with making a quick choice to keep (or not keep) a baby. But there is something questionable with making an artistic representation of a lady doing so, without giving realistic/fleshed-out reasons for why she does so, ONLY BECAUSE America is in the process of rolling back women's reproductive choices.
Posted by Thea
November 17, 2007, 2:20 PM
I forgot to second this:
"I hate you with the fiery passion of a thousand burning suns, Spiderman 3 hours of my life I’ll never get back!"
Posted by Thea
November 17, 2007, 2:21 PM
I haven't seen either of the shmushmortion movies, or the Scrubs episode. But I appreciate the reminder to see Bourne Supremacy and Die Hard "Die to the Nth Degree" (what have I been doing with my time). I just wanted to chip in on the bah-fest on Spiderman 3. A movie that was so bad I turned it off halfway through, to limit loss of my time to extreme suckage.
Posted by Catherine
November 18, 2007, 9:28 PM
This so-called trend is something way bigger than "Hollywoods' Preoccupation". I saw Juno and I think it's a perfect example of right-wing anti-abortion propaganda!
Posted by J.
December 28, 2007, 4:19 PM
Funny you should say so - I ran across this today via feministing and I think it proves your point perfectly:
http://www.suntimes.com/news/commenta...
Note how Juno is mentioned at the end of the (thoroughly offensive) piece.
Posted by Stacey May
December 28, 2007, 5:44 PM
I found this movie, Juno, extremely dangerous in terms of the messages sent to young females. There was no examination of the consequences, in particular, the emotional consequences, of giving birth to a child and then giving the child up for adoption. Juno proceeds in happily ever after adolescent love. This movie was packaged and marketed as a teen comedy. Firstly, there was nothing funny, what-so-ever. Teenagers engaging in sex is a serious topic, and since it was marketed to pubescent and adolescent girls, the producers of this film could not be any more irresponsible. Because of this, I do believe that this film has an anti-abortion/ pro-life agenda.
Secondly, the message of the female as self-sacrificial prevails. Although Juno is portrayed as tough as nails, she does not want to disrupt her boyfriend’s race as she gives birth. And the messages to boys and young men- it is okay to keep playing with their toys and not take any responsibility. Leave that for the females. They will gladly do it. They thrive on it.
Posted by Dianna
December 30, 2007, 9:21 PM
Not exactly Dianna, as far as I can see Juno make very clear to her boyfriend that she isn't exactly "thriving" in her pregnancy. She also manages to communicate some pretty low shots which leave him emotionally empty for much of the movie (ie the idea that she used him instead of the other way around). I see the scenes in and around the abortion clinic as worrying because the girl from her school is far less threatening than the common groups of adult protesters at clinics would actually be to someone like her and the trendy, disinterested, skanky receptionist sends the wrong message about what getting an abortion is like. She makes the choice she does though, in a way I can imagine happening. She feels incapable at first of dealing with her baby, and is afraid to make a scene at school but as she encounters attitudes from others that NO TEANAGER IS CAPABLE OF PROPERLY RAISING A CHILD AND BEING A PREGNANT TEEN IS SHAMEFUL, she decides to challenge these attitudes within herself. Eventually this gives her the courage not only to have the baby, but to continue her relationship with the father of her child, showing that just because she's pregnant, doesn't mean she's lost her sexuality or is has to accept status as an unforgivable screw-up. To me, that's what the kiss (and the finger) at the end is about. Also, despite her initial wish to be distant from her adopting couple, we see a shift in those attitudes, which ultimately helps her support another woman through a divorce. If this were right wing propaganda, I doubt it would deal with divorce in that way. It does strike me as a little skewed though, come to think of it, that Juno never asks her baby's dad for, oh let's say, some sort of financial support or time commitment to help her through pregnancy.
Posted by Myra
January 13, 2008, 10:38 PM
For goodness sake. I'm a 15 year old student, and you really aren't giving us teenagers any credit. I know that having unprotected sex and getting pregnant at 15 is a bad idea, as do most people of my age. I don't think Juno glamourises teen pregnancy, neither has watching it made me think it's a 'good idea' to have unprotected sex, *neither* does it give the message abortion is wrong, in my opinion.
Being a teen-mother doesn't mean you're going to be a bad mother. People my age know that it means you'll have to choose between keeping the baby and a termination, or keeping the baby and giving it up for adoption, or keeping the baby and your education/social life/job.
Juno and Knocked Up show *one side* of the story. You could have another movie about a teenager or a woman who got pregnant and had an abortion, and at some point there probably will.
Posted by Roisin
February 9, 2008, 4:31 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.