In a piece on Rabble.ca today, Heather Mallick reports that the wives and girlfriends of the Ottawa Senators (who call themselves “The Better Halves”) are donating fan fundraising dollars to a Pro-Life organization.
“The Better Halves are giving a third of the proceeds of this year’s $50,000 Christmas Tree raffle to First Place Pregnancy Centre, an Ottawa anti-abortion group run by Pentecostal Christians.”
(By the way, the First Place Pregnancy Centre offers up Proknowledge.org as a resource. Remember them? Pro-life rhetoric masquerading as unbiased information?)
Basically, altruistic hockey fans have been inadvertently donating to a cause they may oppose — and beyond that, there are some tax issues involved:
“The raffle money is channelled through the Sens Foundation, the team’s registered charity arm, which is matching every dollar raised by The Better Halves… Both the taxman and the foundation agree that donations can only support registered charities. They can’t support ‘political or lobby” or “advocacy or special interest groups.’ And they shouldn’t.”
As mentioned in a correction in the article, First Place Pregnancy Centre is a registered charity under a different name, Crisis Pregnancy Centre of Ottawa - but in reading the contents of their website, the intentions of the “charity” are certainly suspect.
“Were the Better Halves abortion hardliners or innocent bunnies when they offered their money to this weird organization? Does the Sens Foundation’s ‘due diligence’ include Google searches?”
More on “Crisis Pregnancy Centres” (from a Pro-Choice perspective) here.
UPDATE: After some further research it appears some people just don’t understand that First Place Pregnancy Centre is (however deceptively) anti-choice. In my opinion, this “resource” link from their website is pretty much all the proof I need. Taking donated money from unknowing fans and giving it to a pro-life organization does not qualify as a pro-choice activity. Planned Parenthood Ottawa explains fully why donating to the centre is problematic:
“We sometimes have women contact us after visiting First Place Pregnancy…sometimes they’re upset that they couldn’t get the information that they wanted and sometimes they’re angry because they feel as if they were tricked into believing that they were going to a pro-choice counselling session only to discover that that was not the case when they got there.”
ANOTHER UPDATE: Fern Hill has more on First Place Pregnancy Centre’s controversial (now updated) links page at Birthpangs: “So, as we reported yesterday, while the Sens are still treating their fans as somnolent cash cows, there has been at least one good thing to come out of this PR fiasco — a little less lying bullshit on the Interwebz.” (Credit where credit’s due: it should be noted that Birthpangs was on the story from the very beginning.)



Digg
six comments
We at Birth Pangs were on this story even before the sainted Heather. ;)
Posted by fern hill
December 5, 2007, 11:26 AM
From the article you linked at the bottom:
"Wait a minute, Ms. Greenwood, isn’t Planned Parenthood the organization that thinks it fair for teens as young as 13 to have access to birth control without their parents’ knowledge?"
Why say that like it's a bad thing? Children are not their parents posessions.
Posted by Kat
December 5, 2007, 2:11 PM
Kat: That article is truly awful. It really confuses the notion of pro-choice. The "13-year olds having access to birth control" comment was an outstandingly bad feature of an outstandingly bad piece.
If someone wants to use their personal funds to support an anti-choice organization I am all for it, but the issue here is that they have taken OTHER people's money and made a choice to spend it in a misleading way.
Posted by Stacey May
December 5, 2007, 2:32 PM
Ditto to what Kat said, that article just seemed so nasty to me (though I'm sure people read our site and think it's nasty...). That paragraph that Kat quoted was also totally a non sequitur. It was meant to prove that Planned Parenthood doesn't believe in choice - but I don't see the link between advocating birth control for sexually active teens, and not advocating choice.
Posted by Thea
December 5, 2007, 2:32 PM
Right on Thea. Bad journalism, really. "Leave them alone and let them raise money," accusing Planned Parenthood of being anti-choice because they want accountability? Hurumph.
Posted by Stacey May
December 5, 2007, 2:40 PM
I just stumbled on this by accident but let me say as PAST donator of funds to the Foundation I will not sent another cent your way! I don't know where I stand on the pro vs. anti abortion issue but a charitable organization should not be sending money to help support one cause or another.
On top of that someone wonders if the Better Halves are hardliner anit-abortion or innocent bunnies, I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that there is a certain number of players who are devout Pentecostal Christians. This was not an innocent good deed gone wrong!
Posted by Mark
April 3, 2008, 3:22 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.