Dove’s still keepin’ it real, and by real I mean an unrealistic, retouched kind of real.
Dove’s ‘Real Beauty’ Pics Could Be Big Phonies?
In a May 12 profile in The New Yorker posted online, Pascal Dangin of New York’s Box Studios is quoted as saying he extensively retouched photos used in the Campaign for Real Beauty, which, if true, could seriously undermine an effort that already has subjected Unilever to considerable consumer and activist backlash in recent months.
The best quote of all?
“I mentioned the Dove ad campaign that proudly featured lumpier-than-usual ‘real women’ in their undergarments,” wrote Lauren Collins in the New Yorker article. “It turned out that it was a Dangin job. ‘Do you know how much retouching was on that?’ he asked. ‘But it was great to do, a challenge, to keep everyone’s skin and faces showing the mileage but not looking unattractive.’”
This comes after Dove has maintained there was no retouching done to the images. Their response is that Pascal Dangin is a liar.
The Shameless Blog has talked extensively about the controversy behind this campaign, namely the hypocrisy of an “accept yourself as you are” and “beware unrealistic marketing” ad hook produced by the same company that brings us female sex slave imagery. Again, it seems that accepting yourself the way you are still involves a lot of retouching.
“No wonder our perception of beauty is distorted.” Um, yah.



Digg
three comments
This just makes me SEETHING mad.
I could never believe this campaign from the beginning, I even did research on the company that owns Dove.
But I was told that I was paranoid,
I was pretty much told that I should put my trust in this company, and be thankful for the campaign.
I'm disgusted.
Posted by Sarah
May 8, 2008, 4:51 PM
I used to believe that this campaign was something good, but after a while my mind wandered. Why did their skin look so flawless? Why did the pro-age woman look so...young? Why are they making firming products if we are to "make peace with our bodies"?
Posted by Brianne
May 8, 2008, 5:45 PM
Unilever responded to this today along with Dangin, saying the quotations in questions were taken out of context. The New Yorker, they claim, got it wrong.
According to a statement, Dangin never worked on the Real Beauty photographs in question, but on the Pro Age campaign that followed in 2007.
Unilever maintains that the Real Beauty photos were altered only to "remove dust" and for colour correction, a standard practice in commercial photography.
Posted by Jeromy Lloyd
May 9, 2008, 4:06 PM
Leave a comment