Yesterday’s discussion over donation programs reminded me that I’ve been remiss, in that I’ve never posted about the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) organization.
The short version is that OLPC started as an initiative out of the MIT Media Lab, where they attempted (and roughly succeeded) in creating a $100 laptop (it currently costs closer to $200), to be made available to countries which historically haven’t had the funds or means to have technology in the classroom.

There was huge interest from the public in this project, and, from tech nerds, in the laptop itself — prompting the “Give 1 Get 1” offer that ran at the end of last year. (OLPC is now set up for donations only).
When I first heard about the XO-1, what I was most attracted to was that they were running free and open source software (and, at least for now, still are). It was such a fundamental element of the project that its use was listed as one of OLPC’s 5 core principles.

Though now it’s looking not so fundamental after all, with Microsoft announcing that OLPC might be running XP as early as this month. (I’ll get into why that’s boo-able if there’s interest in a “Whatsa Free/Open Software” post. Until then I’ll put a sweater on over my “Free as in Freedom” tshirt.)
For more on what OLPC is about, you can read the Wikipedia page here - which includes this short, but valuable, section on “other viewpoints“.
In completely different news (wait, I bring them together at the end), check out Starwood’s Aloft hotel chain, which I’m noting here for featuring rooms and hotel service all wired up for North America’s pervasively technocentric age.
“Each guest room will feature a plug-and-play station in the form of a flat-screen high-definition television. Guests will be able to plug multiple electronic devices — like iPods, mobile devices, cellphones and laptops — into the television to work on a larger screen or simply to charge their devices. Guests will also be able to select their rooms and print out boarding passes at kiosks in the lobby.”
[from NYTimes.com]
And they’ll be in Canada shortly. One by the Montreal airport (accepting reservations as of this Thursday), and one coming in Sept 2009 to Toronto.
(Oh, and apparently also one in Vaughan opening July 2010, whose info was updated between my refreshes of their site. Live interweb action!)
So, to fit these disparate worlds together — I guess wealthy North Americans, rolling in disposable income, can lie on a Starwood-patented bed and project their laptop onto the room’s flat-screen while they donate an XO-1.
Nice and tidy. Right?



Digg
three comments
For what it's worth, Sugar, the original OLPC OS, doesn't seem to be taking the OLPC betrayal lying down.
Posted by Wesley
June 4, 2008, 6:09 PM
Consider this one holla in favour of a free/open source software post. My housemate has been trying to "sell" me (ha) on Linux for months - I love the idea but I think I'm too old of a dog. Love to hear what you think.
Posted by Anna
June 4, 2008, 9:55 PM
I've always wanted one of these since I heard about them around a year ago. But notice how as soon as Microsoft jumps on board their fifth mission is contradicted since the license is $3 US.
Ha.
Posted by brianne
June 5, 2008, 6:39 PM
Leave a comment
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.