This is racist food for thought from the Vancouver Courier:
“Mass immigration, mainly from the Third World, threatens to irrevocably alter the culture of western nations. In his article, Steyn compares shrinking western populations with exploding birthrates in Muslim countries. “Islam has youth and will,” he writes, “Europe has age and welfare.”So, if changing demographics sweep Canada’s dominant Euro-centric culture into history’s dustpan, why should we care?
Here’s why. European culture spawned the now-universal tenets of democratic rule, personal freedom and Christian-based virtue—not to mention many of civilization’s greatest scientific and technological achievements. Immigrants flock to Canada not because it resembles the land from which they flee, but because of our liberating Euro-centric society.
Quebecers understand. Last year’s “reasonable accommodation hearings” officially acknowledged widespread anxiety in la belle province. Quebecers lined up to voice their concern about foreign influence on Quebec culture, thus demonstrating that the altering affects of immigration should be discussed openly—for the benefit of immigrants and residents alike.”
As the full article will tell you, the author is referring to immigration rates in Canada and actually talks about the lawsuit against the oh-so-right-wing Maclean’s from the Canadian Islamic Congress. In 2006 Maclean’s published an article by Mark Steyn entitled “Why the Future Belongs to Islam”, which they correctly allege discriminated against Muslims on religious and racial grounds contrary to Section 7 (1) of the B.C. Human Rights Code.
(For the record, that whole situation in Quebec I personally think unfairly represented what is also true in the rest of the provinces and territories)
Last time I checked, EVERYONE IS AN IMMIGRANT, and unless you are Aboriginal, the differences lie a few generations away from each other. And even then our First Peoples have varying stories of where we came from.


Digg
four comments
"...which they correctly allege discriminated against Muslims on religious and racial grounds contrary to Section 7 (1) of the B.C. Human Rights Code."
I'm genuinely curious: does that mean you believe the case against Steyn and Maclean's is valid and justified? If you do, do you not worry about the precedent it would set, the censorship it would inevitably allow, and what harm it would do to the media in Canada if the complaintants are successful?
I'm with you on all counts of the piece in question (and the ideas behind it) being inexcusably offensive, but do you think (as a member of the media) that media censorship and control is the real answer?
Posted by CURIOUS
June 19, 2008, 12:37 AM
Hello Curious as we are both curiously up late!
The question of media censorship is an interesting one. I used the word "correctly" because I do absolutely agree that the article Steyn wrote is a disgustingly prejudicial one that members of the Muslim community have every right to be offended by and raise actions, legal or otherwise, that violate their charter rights and freedoms.
That being said, do I think censorship is the way to go? Honestly no I don't. But I take real issue with oppression in the media, I don't think it's fair, and I think that in a democratic society, we are entitled to laws and systems of justice that protect us from that.
At the end of the day I think people standing up for what they believe in, standing up for themselves, their community, however that comes out, means something.
And in this instance with this magazine, Maclean's also claims they "remain committed to providing Canadians with a distinct and intelligent voice on the topics they care about most deeply" and in every single word of that statement I would disagree they did that in publishing Steyn's article (or in many of their other articles, for that matter).
Posted by Jessica Yee
June 19, 2008, 2:05 AM
Something I feel is somewhat related to this topic, and also deserving of its own post (if I could think of a good hook): why developed nations are suddenly so concerned about not having enough babies. The discussion regarding "race suicide" is brief, but I think relates back to the fear of a dominant culture being overwhelmed by newer immigrants who don't share the same values.
As for the phenomenon itself: I figured it was only a matter of time before we started seeing it in Canada. Given the Hispanic backlash in the southern United States, the riots in Paris, and the EU's various issues with the inclusion of Turkey, it seems like most places with a steady stream of "undesirable" immigrants are already debating who the real citizens are and who are just freeloaders and subversives looking to undermine the state (guess who gets lumped into that group).
Posted by Wesley
June 19, 2008, 2:29 AM
what a heinous article. i can't believe anyone would point to the reasonable accommodation situation as anything to emulate, considering the extreme racism and xenophobia it blatantly showcased.
Posted by fireeyedgirl
June 20, 2008, 10:51 AM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.