Slate has posted a conversation between a few of its female contributors about American Girl, the doll superpower, on the occasion of their first major motion picture. American Girl dolls are, they suggest, the very opposite of Barbie. Or are they?
While some dolls represent different periods in American history, coming complete with their own historical biographies, the “just like you” dolls come in a wide variety of hair, eye and skin colours. Yes, that’s right – not all the dolls are white! Though, no surprise, their “dark” skin tone seems pretty light to me. And I don’t really know enough to judge the historical accuracy to Disney stereotype ratio of the accessories designed for Kaya, the lone First Nations character.
There was a time when I coveted these dolls, but even at age ten I felt some ambivalence. I knew that American history wasn’t my history, and the relentless patriotism wore a bit thin. But the dolls seemed to reflect my world – they played sports, learned math, and used computers.
Still, at $90 per doll, they sure are pricey. Nowadays, the American Girls are sold with even more clothes, furniture and accessories, from the web, catalogs and several theme park-esque stores. American Girl calls itself a “premiere lifestyle brand”, which sounds a bit smarmy. Is this “lifestyle” about girl power or consumption?
At least some of that commercialism is for a good cause. American Girl has come under attack for donating to Girls Incorporated, a pro-choice, queer positive youth organization.
Torie: I visited the American Girl store in Manhattan not long ago, while killing time, and was astounded by all of the stuff for sale. But I don’t know how much it bothers me. The message is so positive—learning about history, feminism, being true to yourself, reading, friendship—that I might be OK with the rampant commercialism.Noreen: I think you’re getting at a couple things we all find a little troubling—the training in consumerism (the next step was the Delia’s catalog!) and the class issues that the dolls bring up. They’re fairly pricey.
Then again, while I worked on this post, my roommate, for reasons unknown to me, watched part of Bratz: The Movie. She tells me it’s about how you can sing and dance your way into university, and how friends are sort of important, but not as important as boys. Not to mention, the Asian girl is good at science, and the Latina girl inexplicably has a mariachi band in her kitchen.
So what do we think, dearest readers? Is American Girl the lesser of many evils? What dolls, if any, do you buy for the young feminists in your life?



Digg
eight comments
I loved art supplies as a kid; I was never really that into dolls. I remember that my sister had a baby doll that you fed with a bottle and waited until she peed. Even at six, I thought that squeezing a baby so that liquid would squirt out of plastic tubing between her legs was a stupid thing to do.
But I'm struggling with these questions now, because my sister, who has two sweet and lovely boys, just had a girl. And as much as it pains me to see the boys obsession with all things branded Pixar Cars, it will devastate me if my niece gets into Bratz.
(I kind of like these: http://www.shakespearesden.com/mafipu... -- the thought of Dorothy Parker, Virginia Woolf and Frida Kahlo finger puppets actually delights me, although some of their other products do not.)
I do feel that with dolls, it's more about the context in which they are introduced. They are not a complete toy: they can be a tool for imaginative play and narrative building. I do think that some kids probably create wicked progressive stories with their dolls, no matter what kind they are. Generally, though, I have to say that if my niece must have dolls, well, I would be more comfortable if the dolls' narratives started out about history and reading rather than shopping and fashion.
Posted by Megan
July 7, 2008, 9:47 AM
I haven't really thought about buying dolls, since I'm not in the situation for it, but I know I too would be horrified if the feminist-to-be in my life would prefer Barbies or Bratz.
I had a doll similar to American Dolls (mine had baby fat, wore a big print dress and worn glasses) and loved her dearly. But I still played with my Barbies because I had 10 of them, which made it easier to build stories, and one of her. Sure, the American Dolls are nicer than the other options, but I doubt anyone but very rich parents will be able to offer more than one doll to their little girl (or boy, you know).
As for the Bratz movie, if the Latina girl doesn't like the mariachi band in her kitchen, I'll take it.
Posted by Eli
July 7, 2008, 10 AM
My daughter (almost 5yo) loves her Dora dolls and since she's Latina like us, I'm cool with her (well, not skinny tween Dora anyway). I also buy her Groovy Girls dolls, esp since they have a line who are Girl Scouts.
http://www.groovygirls.com/
I can't see us ever buying her American Doll dolls only because of the price. $90? Plus clothes & all that goes with them? Nope.
Posted by Veronica
July 7, 2008, 11:14 AM
Here's a good take on this from Anne Elizabeth Moore who was arrested in an American Girls superstore: http://www.alternet.org/story/21508/
I have had to deal with the doll issue (my girls are now 6 and 11). My first was never interested in dolls so much so it wasn't a problem -- she had one generic doll that she played with and that was good enough for her. She also played a bit with my old Barbies, but she mainly just like to cut their hair. Fine by me.
My second, however, longs for a Bratz doll. (No, it's not because I don't allow them in the house, but nice try.) I try to curb the desire for them by not taking her into stores where they are sold and by avoiding commercial TV.
The American Girl dolls were attractive (by their built-in historical narratives, as Megan states), but their cost was always prohibitive.
The best dolls (and the best toys) are those come with no narratives attached. The most-played with toys in our house have been small, plastic animals who have been everything from warring tribes to everyday families to superheroes.
Posted by Lisa @ Corporate Babysitter
July 7, 2008, 11:26 AM
I'm agreeing with the other comments here. American Girl is owned by Mattel these days; it's a corporate entity, the dolls are very expensive and they do "nickel and dime" parents for every last accessory and outfit.
Having said that, I'd purchase American Girl dolls without reservation. I like that the dolls depict actual children--as opposed to children pretending to be grownups, like Bratz--I like the way the characters are depicted as being active, assertive and intelligent--and I like the fact that while they do have a ways to go, they do seem to make more of an effort at diversity than others. You can buy a wheelchair or glasses for any AG doll, for instance.
Posted by Denise
July 8, 2008, 12:38 AM
I think the AG doll are not only fun to play with but also provide historical education. Also they have great books to help girls cope with growing up.
Posted by Doll Clothes Gal
July 8, 2008, 9:12 AM
Huh,
I loved Barbies when I was wee, but my parents, operating under many of the same principles and constraints outlined here, only ever bought me one of them.
So I would go to my friends houses and play with their Barbies. I had one friend who had a grand total of 121 Barbies. She eventually broke down and gave me one, bringing my grand total to 2.
I haven't got kids yet (sad me) but I think when I finally luck out in that department I will operate on the "all things in moderation including moderation" tip. I can't say I love any line of toys that comes with a "collect them all" dictate, but I also won't force my child to pimp her/his playtime for toys. ;)
Posted by Mir
July 9, 2008, 9:34 AM
"The best dolls (and the best toys) are those come with no narratives attached."
I fully agree with this. The fun of dolls (in my girlhood, at least) comes in making your own scenarios, stories, characters, and so on. I think American Girl is lacking in that respect, as the historical girls all have their own back stories, personalities, and names. The modern dolls do not share this problem but they are incredibly cost prohibitive and would prevent me from creating stories where dolls interact. LAME.
My barbies had some crazy ass stories, because although they came with the name "Barbie" or Teresa or Kira or Skipper or whatever the hell, the backstories were never a big part of the doll. AG has a fully intergrated book/doll/blabla line...it's a lot more structured. I'd rather read books unrelated to my dolls...I can make the stories myself. (or could...this post sounds as if I still play with barbies every night. I would, make no mistake, but my mom gave em all away.)
Interesting tidbit: there is actually a pragmatic reason for Barbie's thin, thin waist: her clothing is made of people-fabric, which is thick, and through the process of sewing and folding, it becomes even thicker. Thus, to maintain a curvy 50's hourglass figure, her waist has to be teeny tiny. The dolls are meant to be clothed, and barbie usually does look a bit more realistic when she's not stripped. (of course, most barbies are naked most of the time anyway...)
Thousands of words have been written about Barbie's negative effects and all that hooha, but I always had barbies and am now a card toting feminist with a brain and a spine. I never blamed my body issues on the blonde scalliwag, nor did I ever hold Barbie up as an example for what I ought to look like--she's a freaking doll for christ's sake, and even as a child I was savvy enough to realize this. I doubt I was alone in this. I even had a pizza Hut playset--overcommercialized and trashy, yes, but we can't blame my body issues and three years as a pizzeria server on Barbie. She caused me no harm. She was fun to dress, play with, hairdress, and sometimes torture. Bratz don't have choppable hair and their clothes are plastic. I find them absolutely ghastly, and felt the same when they were first introduced (when I was a leetle closer to the doll-playing age, but i think still past it) I think the problem lies with their overreliance on corporate "attitude"...which amounts to boring superskankage and overemphasis on shopping and fashion. Barbie has held any kind of job you'd want to name, I think Bratz only go so far as singers in their occupations. I had a doctor barbie for crap's sakes. She had a stethoscope that actually made the sound of a beating heart. Yes, she was fabulously dressed in an evening gown as soon as I lost her doctor's coat, but she could do anything, dammit.
I would totally buy my daughter barbies. They can be a healthy part of a imaginative childhood.
Posted by linda jay
July 20, 2008, 3:05 AM
Leave a comment
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.