Right, so a couple of weeks ago, I was all “colour-coding zomg ftw!”. But colour-coding is just step one of organizational bliss. Step two are filters. Filters much like the one that made this sweet cup of coffee I’m sipping right now (alright, I use a bodum, but still).
Same as last time, I’m going to do a quick runthrough of how I use filters. Gmail writes comprehensive helpdocs, I’m just adding a personal touch. And possibly screenshots. We’ll see…
À propos of nothing, here is a small walking crab (courtesy o’ Gmail’s new emoticon options).
Filters
Applying labels is all well and good, but why do something for yourself, when an invisible algorithm (slash elf) can do it for you?
As of this morning, I have more than 20 filters working their auto-sorting magic on my mail.
Granted the above is not a very informative screenshot.
Here are some of the things these filters are doing for me:
* takes newsletters, adds the appropriate (colour-coded) label, and pushes them straight past my inbox and into the “archive”. To be read at leisure.
* auto-applies labels to mail from clients, as soon as they arrive. I sort of think of it like a robot that sits in my hallway and sticks a “Hello, My name is: CLIENT” sticker on people as they come through the door.
* takes mail sent to my different email aliases and tells me which one people are writing to.
I mostly use my filters for professional stuff, but your inbox is your kingdom, and you can use them to manage personal stress too:
* Find emails from your mom hard to take? Create a filter that applies a “mom” label + skips your inbox. Then her messages will sit in tidy “mom” pile until you’re emotionally-fortified and ready to read them.
* Have a snoopy partner/sibling/roommate who may see your mail over your shoulder while you’re planning a party/present/ambush? Set up a filter that puts those messages in a “nothing to see here” pile + archives them, and you can read those messages when that person is not around.
Example: I love the one-sentence preview that Gmail gives you (optionally) on your inbox. But come Christmastime it becomes a real problem, when my mother-in-law gets right to the point, starting emails with “so we’re getting him THIS…” and I have to scramble to throw a sweater over the screen as Mr. Snoopypants wanders into my office.
* Have a big love in your life? Select for messages from them, and automatically “star it” so they never got lost in inbox clutter. Although, you might want to pick one use of the star, and not star all their messages as well as, say, deadlines. “Yay, an email from puppytoes! Oh… wait… no… that’s about my essay.” It’s a big come down.
So, everyone cool on filters?
That didn’t take very long, so how’s about a bonus round: Labs Features!
Most of the time when applications try to get my attention about an earth-shattering new thing they’re doing, I ignore them. Like when iTunes wants me to upgrade (I’m starting to hate you iTunes).
But I dropped by Gmail’s “New! A bunch of stuff” link to see what they were up to.
A few of their features I’ve been trying out — you can access all of these through your Gmail by going to “Settings” then “Labs”. (Update: I should mention that the Labs features are experimental, so they might flake out on you. Use with a bit of buyer beware. If you really have a problem, there is a disable-all-Labs escape hatch you can read about here):
* Superstars: Gives you more star options — like red exclamation points or blue stars or purple question marks. In the end I found it didn’t add much to my labeling system, but it’s a nice alternative.
* Right-side chat and Right-side labels: Now this I like. It was getting pretty scroll-y in my Gmail, because I like to leave both my labels and my chats open. But that meant that I was hardly ever starting conversations with my lower-alphabet friends, because they were usually not visible. Now that I have my window balanced with labels to the left and chats to the right, Xandro’s back!
* Navbar drag and drop: Since I started using a Mac, my need to drag and drop has become acute. I want my labels above my Google Docs gadget. No, I want my chats above my labels. No, I want my… (now if they’ll just enable the right-hand side as a drop-zone).
* Google Docs gadget: See your recent docs, search existing or create new ones, in a gadget just to the left of your mail. Add a gadget, save a tab. (Not to be confused with these kinds of tabs).
* Forgotten Attachment Detector: Have a lot of “D’Oh!” moments when you realize that you did not, in fact, attach the “see attached” attachment? Google tries to you help you out with a little warning.
* Custom Label Colors: *drool*
* Mark as Read Button: Yes, I cheat. I know I’m not going to read those threads, they know I’m not going to read those threads, but I don’t want them showing up as unread mail. Because I must-read-unread-mail. Actually my Google Notifier says I have unread mail right now, so… um… I’ll be right… *click*




Digg
14 comments
This is great! Thanks for the explanation!!
Posted by jax
November 5, 2008, 6:37 PM
Ack! I can't keep track of all these features! I am about five years behind the magical gmail curve at all times. And somehow, all I ever learn to use is the emoticons. I was a big fan of the animated monkey in the chat program, but this crab is even cuter. Um... yeah.
Posted by Michelle
November 5, 2008, 9:50 PM
I still love the monkey, but now I want the crab. Thanks for the great explanation and breakdown, Catherine!
Posted by Stark
November 5, 2008, 10:32 PM
Do you just click on the item you want to drag and move it? If so, it doesn't work for me.
Posted by Jelly
November 5, 2008, 10:58 PM
And I don't have "Labs" under "Settings."
Posted by Jelly
November 5, 2008, 11 PM
Hey Jelly -- You have to have Navbar drag and drop enabled before clicking and dragging will work for you. And you turn that feature on under "Labs". So first we need to find Labs for you.
What do you have under "Settings"? Alternatively, do you have a little green thing that looks like a beaker to the right of your email address (at the top right of the screen)? That's also shortcut to Labs.
Posted by Catherine
November 5, 2008, 11:11 PM
Gmail filters were there ever since there was Gmail. Filters are standard for any type of decent e-mail client or e-mail service. I've been using Gmail filters for several years, and I've been using e-mail filters in general for longer than that.
I know you (Shameless staff) want to include geekiness in feminism, but think about who your target audience is. I myself am a feminist geek, and I'm interested in the intersection between feminism and geekism. However, when I read what looks like an interesting post on Shameless about something techy, I am often disappointed.
Things like this and "no, this does not involve math" grate on my nerves. As a female geek that works in the computer industry, I actually have to deal with and counter male geeks' assumptions that women don't like math and don't know how to use computers, despite the fact that they hired me.
Hopefully, you can see why anti-math, anti-science, and ancient tech news posts bother me deeply. It's like confirming stereotypes. :\
Posted by Restructure!
November 6, 2008, 12:14 AM
Restructure! --
Every once in a while, maybe even often, I'll be writing about topics that to more technical people are old news, and maybe downright boring. But I'm not only writing for more technical people.
Re: thinking about our target audience. Shameless is a feminist magazine, but it's not an explicitly technical one. It's great to be a feminist and a geek, but one doesn't necessarily cause the other.
Talking about simple everyday tools is something geeks tend to be snobby about, and I don't respect that. There's an "all or nothing" geek culture that I'm working to break down. You're not geek /enough/, you're not technical /enough/, you mispronounced LaTeX.
There's a big middle ground of technical proficiency for both men and women. I base the content of this column on feedback. If I hear from people that they found a subject helpful, I write more on it. No matter where on the more-or-less technical spectrum that falls.
Look around a non-technical office and see how many people use half the features or functionality available to them (e.g. filters). I'm trying to create a space here where you can ask any tech question you want (about IPv6 or about Word templates) and get an informative and non-condescending ("what do you mean you don't know about X") answer.
The point of this column is to talk about /anything/ technical or "geeky" that we find interesting. Whether that's something mundane like filters, or Mir's feedback on the AMC conference, or about blu-ray, or videogames. Half of even this "ancient tech news" post is about Labs: where Google tests their newest experimental features.
If there is a technical or geeky topic you'd like to see in a future Wired Wednesday post, make a suggestion. I'll probably take you up on it.
Posted by Catherine
November 6, 2008, 1:44 PM
As someone who does not at all identify as a geek, but still really likes knowing how things work and how to take them apart and put them back together, and is working on some DIY computer skills (teaching myself html and css... I loves you htmldog even if your jokes are sometimes horrific), I would just like to say that I REALLY appreciate Catherine's column. I like feeling that something so often rareified and shelved on a high recess of geekdom can be broken down for someone like me, who doesn't necessarily want to be writing elegant code but also doesn't want to feel completely alienated from infrastructure I use every day.
THANKS CATHERINE.
Posted by Anna
November 6, 2008, 4:09 PM
As a feminist who loves geeking out but often feels intimidated by a sometimes dismissive and overwhelmingly complex and everchanging geek culture (and does most of my geeking in private), I find this column incredibly useful and inspiring. The reality is that the Shameless readership (and target audience) is primarily made up of teenagers, many of which don't get the opportunity to learn about even the most basic of tech issues in a supportive environment.
I don't want to speak for Catherine, but I think we try to approach tech issues in the same way we'd approach politics, pop culture, etc - we assume nothing about our reader's previous knowledge of an issue and try to provide necessary resources while being as inclusive and innovative as possible. Sometimes this means people who have a lot of knowledge on a particular topic will feel disappointed, but it also means that people who knew very little will have a door opened.
I am well out of my teens yet still learned a lot from this post and continue to learn alot from this column. So yes, thank you Catherine.
Posted by Stacey May
November 6, 2008, 7:18 PM
Okay, I misunderstood the mission statement, then. When I read this part:
I thought it meant to reach out, appeal to, and emphasize non-mainstream subcultures, versus appealing to a "general audience". I didn't assume that Shameless was an explicitly technical feminist magazine, but I thought that it shouldn't give priority to the mainstream perspective over the marginal one.
It's an ambitious goal, though, and it's hard to appeal to everyone, since everybody is mainstream in one way and non-mainstream in another. Still, "no, this does not involve math" seems similar to Teen Talk Barbie saying, "Math class is tough."
What I am interested in in particular is women & technology. However, I don't think tech stuff itself is gendered, so a tech post that is interesting to me can be about pretty much any random technical thing that I don't know about (and there is a lot) and that I find useful. What is gendered is the sexism and how we raise girls and boys differently, so to me, a post about women & tech would be about sexism in mainstream geek & tech culture.
Actually, I want to read a feminist analysis of HOWTO Encourage Women in Linux. I strongly agree with some parts and strongly disagree with other parts, as the parts I disagree with seem to be (internalized sexism) stereotyping and the author's own projection.
Posted by Restructure!
November 6, 2008, 7:30 PM
Nope, I don't have a green beaker or anything Labs related under Settings. I have another Gmail account and checked if that one has anything, but that's not the case. Maybe Google chose random Gmail accounts to test out these features?
Posted by Jelly
November 8, 2008, 8:55 PM
Hey, I have "Labs" under "Settings" now! Maybe Gmail rolled out the testing features gradually?
I think the Gmail blocker is a good idea, but there should be an option to choose the length of time it's blocked. I'd probably choose an hour--15 minutes isn't enough to make me step away. But then that's less time you're using Gmail, and they don't really want that, do they?
Posted by Jelly
November 11, 2008, 8:24 AM
Hey Jelly -- just came back to drop you a "haven't forgotten about you, still looking for an answer" note... awesome that it sorted itself out for you.
I have the forgotten attachment detector on and so far it's 1 for 2.
Posted by Catherine
November 18, 2008, 2:12 PM
Leave a comment
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.