As Jayme Poisson tells us in “Mothers of Invention” (Shameless, Fall 2008), Countess Ada (Née Byron) Lovelace was one of the world’s first computer programmers. In fact, her programs, written for friend Charles Babbage’s Analytical Engine, pre-date the existence of the machine itself, since Babbage died before it reached completion. Both a bleeding edge technician, and the purveyor of Romantic-Era vaporware, Lovelace was a pioneering expert in the novel field of computation in the early parts of the 19th century.
This week Suw Charman-Anderson, angered by yet another set of fairly juvenile activities centred around women, geekiness and objectification, made a pledge that she would write about a woman in technology she admired on March 24th. That date strikes me as being like, the distant future, but assuming I remember, I will certainly come up with someone I can profile from the canon of my personal acquaintances.
Now I have already gotten irritated about the yearly Wired “Sexiest Geeks” contest so this year I am pleased to see that the user generated list actually contains sexy geeks that do not conform to stereotype. That being said, the top 10 are still… Well, I don’t know if it’s their geekiness per se that got them bumped to the top of the list. Unless “geekiness” is actually a cup-size and I misunderstood something?
Equally infuriating to Suw is this post on Techcrunch that features the “hotness of girls falling out of planes in bikinis”. (Note: involves some upper body nudity and the aforementioned airplane). In any case, objectification of women, and the concurrent denigration of their intelligence is what Ada Lovelace Day intends to address.
So, if you think “Geekiness” and “Sexiness” (granted highly subjective as categories) need to be reclaimed from the terrain of air gymnastics and the disturbing slaverings of fan-boy culture, then by all means, write some purple prose to your favorite geeks on March 24th as well.
Note: As quid pro quo I would suggest that like the Wired list this year has done, a bit of gender-bending would be a breath of fresh air. The point (to me anyway) is not only to recognize geeks that have vajeens, period. It’s to celebrate under-recognized nerds, innovators, hippies with old linux boxes they use to keep track of their ascending sign, whatever. Just no more of the typical boring celebration of girls for their hooters loosely disguised as geekiness.
In summation:
Girls with boobies, + boys with a staring problem != sexy geeks;
Loop +1; return



Digg
five comments
Oh, I love Ada Lovelace. And group blogging! This sounds like a lot of fun. Count me in!
Posted by Stark
January 7, 2009, 8:48 PM
Earlier I left a comment here stating why it is sad that this post is 'honoring' a woman using Facebook, a corporate social networking site which dishonors women worldwide. I left the link to http://aworldbeyondcapitalism.org/ind... a website where it explains in detail why Facebook dishonors women in every way. Can someone please tell me why my comment was deleted? You comment policy states "Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view." Well, I am a severely disabled African-American and I am wondering my point of view is being censored while this blog that is supposed to stand for feminist values yet promotes Facebook. Can someone answer that rather than censor my post?
Posted by T_Peace
January 9, 2009, 12:21 AM
Because the comment wasn't relevant to Mir's post, and because the purpose of the comment seemed to be entirely to advertise your website. And we delete all advertising comments because most of them are posted by robots.
Posted by Cate Simpson
January 9, 2009, 11:07 AM
hi T_peace,
While I agree with many of the points you raise about Facebook and Myspace, I believe as a writer it is ultimately up to my readers to choose how they want to engage in a day Like Ada Lovelace day. For many young women (who are the target audience of this blog) Facebook is a primary mode of communication, warts and all. If I don't give them a chance to express their feminists value while using that interface then I am trying to control how and where they act, and that's not my responsibility. As you can see, there were two ways to engage with Ada Lovelace day posted, via pledgebank and via Facebook.
Many thanks for your feedback though, and keep exposing all the dastardly behaviour perpetrated by Zukerman and Co.
Posted by Mir
January 9, 2009, 12:52 PM
Dear Cate and MIR,
I created a petition about Shameless in hopes that your feminist ethics will rise to the occasion and in hopes your readers will encourage you to do the right thing. Petition found here: http://peacecommunities.org/drupal
Thank you for your thoughts and all the wonderful work that you do. It is my hope that you will continue the great work that you do.
Love for the people,
-T
Posted by T_Peace
January 9, 2009, 5:13 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.