Being a word/books person, I do a lot of thinking about the power of language. The more progressive blogs and new sources I read, and the more I talk and think about feminist and progressive issues on a daily basis, the more I notice the words people drop into casual conversation that make me pause.
Language is more powerful than we realize. At its best, it can facilitate communication, bridge huge distances and build communities. But as we’ve heard, with great power comes great responsibility, and I believe that as feminists, it’s important for us to be conscious of the words we choose when communicating and to avoid problematic and alienating language as much as possible – not only to avoid offending or alienating others, but to hold ourselves to the highest standards and set a positive example.
Problematic or triggering language is all around us: everything from “that’s so gay” to “what a pussy” to “that exam totally raped me.” Examples like these are obvious, but some that are more often overlooked include “that’s so lame” and “you’re insane” (ableist, physically and mentally, respectively). Personally, expressions that are dismissive of mental/emotional differing abilities (“insane,” “crazy,” “stupid”) are ones I’m currently working on eliminating from my vocabulary.
I’m not necessarily advocating becoming the language police, and I know that different social situations have different standards of communication. It’s just something to think about.
I’ve only given a few examples in this post. What are some of your personal language peeves, and are you working on being more conscious of your words? Do you call out others who use problematic language?


Digg
six comments
It's interesting that you posted this, because it's something I've actually been thinking about recently, for no particular reason - specifically the problems with words like "crazy." And I've decided that I will defend my right to use "crazy" to describe situations or feelings that are frustrating, bizarre, or out of control. Because I believe that unlike terms that refer to gender or race or sexual orientation, "crazy" belongs to the general human experience. Whether or not we've been diagnosed with a mental illness, we've all felt crazy, out of whack, out of sorts, we've all done things or been in situations that felt or seemed crazy. While it's true that definitions of sanity do not necessarily cross cultural or historical boundaries, and the treatment of people who are placed on the other side of that definition has been and continuous to be deplorable, we can't give ownership of the word over to those who arbitrarily decide its borders. I mean, are we going to say that someone who's been diagnosed as bi-polar is allowed to use the word "crazy" but not someone who got really stressed out at their job and threw and handful of live shrimp at their boss? Why let contingent medical and social definitions decide, instead of we the people?
I claim "crazy" for myself, not for doctors and therapists and talk shows to decide. I think it's a word that belongs to everyone (unlike fag or pussy) and therefore is okay to use without feeling like you're smearing an "othered" segment of the population.
Posted by Anna
February 3, 2010, 2:47 PM
"...but some that are more often overlooked include 'that’s so lame'"
could anyone explain the origins of 'lame'??... ive always thought it was an appropriate substitue for phrases like ' thats so gay'. curious to know how it may have been twisted..
Posted by m
February 3, 2010, 11:31 PM
Well, the definition of "lame" is as follows:
1. crippled or physically disabled, esp. in the foot or leg so as to limp or walk with difficulty.
2. impaired or disabled through defect or injury: a lame arm.
The term has been "twisted" to equate something negative with having a physical disability.
Posted by Julia
February 4, 2010, 9:22 AM
I agree that the usage of "lame" raises issues, as do "insane", "retarded" and "gay". But "lame" has such a strong foothold in everyday language. "uncool" doesn't have the same impact and sounds oddly adult and do-goody. I refuse to limit it from my language by eliminating "crazy" or even "insane" (though that's about as far as my acceptance goes, I suppose because I find the metaphor of sanity/insanity captures how people feel when they're confronted with situations which cause illogical thinking. Crazy and stupid are not really words which refer to the insane in particular (if they have these origins I guess the connection has been lost, because I don't know anyone who would consider crazy, stupid and mentally challenged equivalent terms. I use all these terms, but avoid "retarded" and "gay" because I feel they still call to mind the people their definition refers to and pass judgment on those people. There are also many suitable substitutes for them. Anybody got comebacks for people who use "retarded" or "gay" as insults or insult-adjectives?
Posted by Myra
February 4, 2010, 3:31 PM
Thank you, I absolutely hate when people say "that's so gay" as an insult. How would you like it if an aspect of your identity was used as an insult? They discuss this on http://www.thinkbeforeyouspeak.com. Also, saying "faggot"...a faggot is a bundle of twigs...Same with retarded, it's so un-PC.
My personal language pet peeve would also be when people misuse the word 'literally'. Not just when they use it when they shouldn't, eg. I literally exploded with joy, but when there is no figurative way to do what they're talking about! It is so annoying! Where are the language police when you need them?
Posted by Daphne
February 7, 2010, 10:14 AM
What about using "gay" as a compliment? In the right context (i.e. not being yelled out a car window by a homophobe) I wonder if we can turn it around. I know that there are certain qualities I associate with being gay (caring about your friends and community, being committed to radical politics, being a bomb on the dancefloor) and I wouldn't hesitate to tell the right person at the right time that they are being totally gay. Of course these qualities don't apply to all gay people everywhere, in the same way that negative stereotypes don't either. So is it just as bad to universalize positive things as it is pejorative? I don't think so... I think we could all do with being a little more gay a lot more of the time.
Posted by Anna
February 7, 2010, 3:51 PM
Leave a comment
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.