Web Features

Stir it Up: The Dirt on Corporate Organics

April 1st, 2006     by Caroline Pelletier     Issue 8: Issue 8: The Miss G__ Project     Comments

What comes to mind when you think of organic food? Fruit pocked with holes and wormy veggies? Food grown on small farms in a way that’s closer to the earth? Though this may have been the reality at one point, it’s now only partially true.

Nearly half of the products stocking the shelves of your average natural food store are now produced by large American-owned corporations. It’s their new niche market. Organic foods are being mass produced and sold at stores like Wal-Mart and Costco. Many Canadian grocery stores, such as the Loblaws-Provigo chain, feature wide aisles of these products. And now, just as the word “organic” is becoming mainstream, some purists are claiming that the meaning of the word has been subverted and weakened.

Think of the organic or natural food brands you know. Boca Foods burgers are produced by Kraft Foods. Imagine soy products, Earth’s Best and Yves Veggie Cuisine products are made by the Hain Celestial Group, which is partially owned by Heinz. General Mills, Kellogg’s, Dole, Pepsi, Campbell Soup Company and Unilever all produce and sell popular organic food products. But you wouldn’t know it because the products’ packaging doesn’t reveal their corporate sources. While plenty of organic food companies started off as independent businesses, they’ve been bought out by large corporations that are changing what it means to be organic.

Many consumers are being duped into thinking they’re living in accordance with the organic philosophy—producing food in a way that’s sustainable and in harmony with nature—when, in reality, they’re padding the pockets of the food industry’s CEOs. Unfortunately, the drive for profit doesn’t mesh with the organic ethos. In fact, modern organic agriculture developed in response to large-scale farming and corporate food production.

In North America, organics represents a sliver of the food industry’s annual sales—only about two percent. But the growth of sales is skyrocketing at the rate of 20 percent every year, a statistic that’s mind-boggling to businesspeople. As Michael Pollan wrote on progressive news site Common Dreams back in 2001, “Now that organic food has established itself as a viable alternative food chain, agribusiness has decided that the best way to deal with that alternative is simply to own it.”

Consumer advocacy groups fear that the popularization of organic foods is making the term meaningless. Traditionally, organic food is produced without the use of chemical fertilizers, antibiotics, growth stimulants, pesticides or genetic modification. Organic meat comes from animals that are fed only grass and aren’t given antibiotics. However, a country’s government defines what can be sold as organic in stores, meaning definitions vary from place to place and may not meet all the aforementioned specifications. Industry lobby groups are pushing to weaken the standards so that it’s easier to produce foods that can be labelled organic by law.

For example, the U.S.-based Organic Trade Association, a food industry lobby group, has been campaigning to allow the use of certain artificial ingredients in organic foods, claiming this will ensure the continued growth of the organic food industry. Groups such as these are especially powerful in the U.S., where politicians and big business are often strong allies. As Canadians, we should be wary of this trend because our southern neighbour produces about 90 percent of the organic foods found in our grocery stores.

If this is the slippery slope down which we’re going, will “organic” completely lose its meaning? Is the new flock of organic food buyers missing the point of eating organic?

Organic foods have not been proven to be healthier than conventional foods. Most studies claim there’s no nutritional difference between an organic tomato and a conventionally grown tomato, for instance. But it has been scientifically proven that organic farming is much more environmentally sustainable than non-organic farming. In fact, that’s one of the main advantages of organic farming. Agriculture and nature conservation are closely linked, and organic agriculture boosts biodiversity (the number of species and plants found in an environment). There are more birds on organic farms, for example, and a greater number of bird species as well.

Organic farms achieve this in part through the use of mixed farming (planting a variety of crops together) rather than monoculture (planting the same crop in the same field year after year). The mass production of organics would likely trigger a switch to monoculture, which makes crops much more susceptible to disease and depletes the soil of nutrients—environmental friendliness be damned! That’s not to mention the pollution created when transporting these foods all the way across the continent from California or British Columbia. As researchers at London’s City University have found, buying locally grown, non-organic food is greener than buying organic food that needs to be shipped from miles away. According to the proximity principle, it’s best to buy food that’s been produced within 20 kilometres of where you live.

Luckily, there are ways to find organic foods that have been locally grown. A good deal of organic food is still produced the old-fashioned way. Many cities now have organic markets where you can buy produce straight from the local farmers who grew it. Alternately, services such as Le Jardin des Anges in Montreal and Green Earth Organics in Toronto and Vancouver will deliver fresh organic fruits and veggies right to your door. This may be a pricier alternative, but if you can afford it, it’s a good way to guarantee you’re getting what you pay for.

So don’t let big business get you down. With a little information and determination, it’s possible to eat in an ethical, earth-conscious way.

Tags:

« DIY: Hanging Lamp

Letter from the Editors (Issue 8) »